WK
Wayne Kauffman
Wed, May 14, 2025 10:21 AM
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
------------------------------------
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
- Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
- Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
- Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
- Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
- Wayne
AB
Atticus Beachy
Wed, May 14, 2025 2:31 PM
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
-
Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
-
John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
-
Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search
[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
> In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
>
> Here's a summary of the findings:
>
> - Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
> - Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
> - Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
>
> - Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
> - John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
> - Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
> [1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
> [[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
>
> - Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
>
> Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
>
> - Wayne
JG
James G. Hermsen
Wed, May 14, 2025 2:37 PM
Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should give one something to seriously pause and think about.
Hoosierly Yours,
James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217
317-881-4600 main
317-679-1466 cell
Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act Creatively, Live Ethically.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,Atticus On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should give one something to seriously pause and think about.
Hoosierly Yours,
James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217
317-881-4600 main
317-679-1466 cell
Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act Creatively, Live Ethically.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,Atticus On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
------------------------------------
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
- Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
- Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
- Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
- Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
- Wayne
_______________________________________________
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
DM
Dick Moyer
Wed, May 14, 2025 2:40 PM
It's like a self-driving car; you better watch the road.
Dick Moyer
Klein, TX
From: James G. Hermsen via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:37 AM
To: Wayne Kauffman dna_wayne@yahoo.com; Atticus Beachy atticus.beachy@protonmail.com
Cc: SAGA ListServer List list@maillist.saga-omii.org
Subject: [List] Re: AI based research
Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should give one something to seriously pause and think about.
Hoosierly Yours,
James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217
317-881-4600 main
317-679-1466 cell
Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act Creatively, Live Ethically.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.orgmailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.orgmailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
- Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
- Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
- Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
* Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
* John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
* Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
- Andreas Kauffman (1668-1743) - Ancestors Family Search https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
[Source icon]https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
ancestors.familysearch.orghttps://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
- Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.orgmailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.orgmailto:list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
It's like a self-driving car; you better watch the road.
Dick Moyer
Klein, TX
From: James G. Hermsen via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:37 AM
To: Wayne Kauffman <dna_wayne@yahoo.com>; Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com>
Cc: SAGA ListServer List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org>
Subject: [List] Re: AI based research
Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should give one something to seriously pause and think about.
Hoosierly Yours,
James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217
317-881-4600 main
317-679-1466 cell
Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act Creatively, Live Ethically.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org<mailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org>> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org<mailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org>> wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
------------------------------------
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
* Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
* Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
* Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
* Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
* John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
* Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
<https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
1. Andreas Kauffman (1668-1743) - Ancestors Family Search <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
<https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
[Source icon]<https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
ancestors.familysearch.org<https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
* Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
- Wayne
_______________________________________________
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org<mailto:list@maillist.saga-omii.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org<mailto:list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org>
KR
Karl Rhodes
Wed, May 14, 2025 3:21 PM
I recently listened to an AI-generated discussion (audio file) about Elder
John Kline's will, which I am researching. The AI discussion picked up on
one of my theories about the will and presented it as a fact. So be very
wary. -Karl
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 10:41, Dick Moyer via List <
list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
It’s like a self-driving car; you better watch the road.
Dick Moyer
Klein, TX
From: James G. Hermsen via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:37 AM
To: Wayne Kauffman dna_wayne@yahoo.com; Atticus Beachy <
atticus.beachy@protonmail.com>
Cc: SAGA ListServer List list@maillist.saga-omii.org
Subject: [List] Re: AI based research
Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for
themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI
is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final
word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially
to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should
give one something to seriously pause and think about.
Hoosierly Yours,
James G. Hermsen
8108 Laura Lynne Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46217
317-881-4600 main
317-679-1466 cell
Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act
Creatively, Live Ethically.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <
list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without
external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it
will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called
"hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is
Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and
provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then
check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <
list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out
there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI
systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob
Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in
WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of
uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on
available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for
his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
- *Often Cited as Unknown:* Several genealogical records and
researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the
father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant
to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts
suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA
analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related
to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
- *Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility:* Some research,
noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as
a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA
evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother,
cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often
presented as uncertain.
- *Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:*
- *Hans Kauffman:* This name appears in some online family trees, for
example, on Geni.
- *John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman:* These names are also
found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- *Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman:* This name has been listed in
at least one family history compilation. 1
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
[image: Source icon]
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
ancestors.familysearch.org
https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743
- *Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research:* It's important to
note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting
information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be
an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For
instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman
line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac
Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it
is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's
father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
I recently listened to an AI-generated discussion (audio file) about Elder
John Kline's will, which I am researching. The AI discussion picked up on
one of my theories about the will and presented it as a *fact*. So be very
wary. -Karl
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 10:41, Dick Moyer via List <
list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
> It’s like a self-driving car; you better watch the road.
>
>
>
> Dick Moyer
>
> Klein, TX
>
>
>
> *From:* James G. Hermsen via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2025 9:37 AM
> *To:* Wayne Kauffman <dna_wayne@yahoo.com>; Atticus Beachy <
> atticus.beachy@protonmail.com>
> *Cc:* SAGA ListServer List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org>
> *Subject:* [List] Re: AI based research
>
>
>
> Great advice Atticus. People are now letting machines think for
> themselves and never give any thought about the answers. As they say, AI
> is NOT the gospel. Perhaps a tool, but should never be taken as the final
> word. Think of all the garbage that is generated politically and socially
> to create conspiracy theories, lies, and false validations and that should
> give one something to seriously pause and think about.
>
>
>
> Hoosierly Yours,
>
> *James G. Hermsen*
> 8108 Laura Lynne Lane
> Indianapolis, IN 46217
>
>
>
> 317-881-4600 main
> 317-679-1466 cell
>
>
>
> *Question Critically, Think Logically, Communicate Clearly, Act
> Creatively, Live Ethically.*
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:32:25 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy via List <
> list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without
> external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it
> will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called
> "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is
> Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and
> provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then
> check the websites for yourself.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Atticus
>
> On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <
> list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
>
> In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out
> there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI
> systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob
> Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in
> WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of
> uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on
> available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for
> his father.
>
> Here's a summary of the findings:
>
> - *Often Cited as Unknown:* Several genealogical records and
> researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the
> father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant
> to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts
> suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA
> analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related
> to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
> - *Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility:* Some research,
> noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as
> a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA
> evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother,
> cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often
> presented as uncertain.
> - *Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:*
>
>
> - *Hans Kauffman:* This name appears in some online family trees, for
> example, on Geni.
> - *John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman:* These names are also
> found in various user-submitted genealogies.
> - *Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman:* This name has been listed in
> at least one family history compilation. 1
>
> <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
>
> *1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search
> <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>*
>
>
>
> <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
>
> [image: Source icon]
> <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>
>
> *ancestors.familysearch.org
> <https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743>*
>
>
>
> - *Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research:* It's important to
> note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting
> information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be
> an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For
> instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman
> line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac
> Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
>
> Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it
> is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's
> father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
>
> - Wayne
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
> _______________________________________________
> List mailing list -- list@maillist.saga-omii.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to list-leave@maillist.saga-omii.org
>
WK
Wayne Kauffman
Wed, May 14, 2025 10:12 PM
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,Atticus On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
- Wayne
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:31:42 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com> wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,Atticus On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
------------------------------------
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
- Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
- Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
- Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
- Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
- John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
- Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1 1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search ancestors.familysearch.org
- Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
- Wayne
AB
Atticus Beachy
Thu, May 15, 2025 2:54 AM
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Always be skeptical; AI will sometimes say things like this:
[eat_rocks.jpeg]
Kind regards,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:31:42 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy atticus.beachy@protonmail.com wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
-
Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
-
John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
-
Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search
[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Always be skeptical; AI will sometimes say things like this:
[eat_rocks.jpeg]
Kind regards,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
> Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
>
> Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
>
> Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
>
> - Wayne
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:31:42 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
>
> Best,
> Atticus
> On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
>
>> In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
>>
>> Here's a summary of the findings:
>>
>> - Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
>> - Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
>> - Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
>>
>> - Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
>> - John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
>> - Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
>> [1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
>> [[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
>>
>> - Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
>>
>> Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
>>
>> - Wayne
AB
Atticus Beachy
Thu, May 15, 2025 2:59 AM
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Kind regards,Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:31:42 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy atticus.beachy@protonmail.com wrote:
Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
Best,
Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
Here's a summary of the findings:
-
Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
-
Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
-
Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
-
Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
-
John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
-
Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search
[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org
-
Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Kind regards,Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
> Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
>
> Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
>
> Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
>
> - Wayne
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:31:42 AM EDT, Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that you shouldn't believe anything an AI says without external corroboration. When an AI doesn't know the answer to something, it will sometimes make up a reasonable sounding explanation (this is called "hallucination"). A good choice for sifting through online information is Perplexity (https://www.perplexity.ai/), which will search the web and provide you with the links where it found the information. You can then check the websites for yourself.
>
> Best,
> Atticus
> On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:22 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
>
>> In researching individuals one can evaluate what information may be out there in sources which you may not be aware of by querying some of the AI systems. The Gemini AI spit out the following synopsis for immigrant Jacob Kauffman. This answer appears to be influenced by details present in WikiTree, specific books, and a couple of public ancestry.com trees.
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> The father of the immigrant Jacob Kauffman, born in 1737, is a subject of uncertainty and varying claims within genealogical sources. Based on available information, there is no single, definitively confirmed name for his father.
>>
>> Here's a summary of the findings:
>>
>> - Often Cited as Unknown: Several genealogical records and researchers, particularly those referencing Y-DNA testing, state that the father of the Jacob Kauffman born in January 1737 (often an Amish immigrant to Pennsylvania who married Elizabeth Zug) is unknown. Some accounts suggest his parents may have died during the immigration voyage. DNA analysis has reportedly shown that this Jacob Kauffman may not be related to certain well-documented Swiss Mennonite Kauffman lines.
>> - Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a Possibility: Some research, noted on platforms like WikiTree, proposes Carl Heinrich Jacob Kauffman as a potential father. This hypothesis is sometimes supported by Y-DNA evidence suggesting a close genetic relationship (such as father, brother, cousin, or uncle) between the two. However, this connection is often presented as uncertain.
>> - Other Names Suggested in Various Genealogies:
>>
>> - Hans Kauffman: This name appears in some online family trees, for example, on Geni.
>> - John Kauffman or Johannes Jacob Kauffman: These names are also found in various user-submitted genealogies.
>> - Andrew (Johan Andreas) Kauffman: This name has been listed in at least one family history compilation. 1
>> [1. Andreas Kauffman (1668–1743) - Ancestors Family Search](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
>> [[Source icon]ancestors.familysearch.org](https://ancestors.familysearch.org/en/L5T3-77X/andreas-kauffman-1668-1743)
>>
>> - Conflicting Information and Ongoing Research: It's important to note that genealogical records can sometimes contain conflicting information, and the parentage of Jacob Kauffman (born 1737) appears to be an area of ongoing research and discussion among genealogists. For instance, some DNA research indicates a connection to a Michael Kauffman line, while ruling out connections to others like Andrew Kauffman or Isaac Kauffman lines from Canton Bern, Switzerland.
>>
>> Due to these complexities and contradictions in the available records, it is not possible to provide a single, undisputed name for Jacob Kauffman's father. Researchers often caution that his parentage remains unproven.
>>
>> - Wayne
WK
Wayne Kauffman
Thu, May 15, 2025 11:23 AM
I think you are to focused on the concept of "search." What is being addressed by AI is the collection, filtering, and transformation of information into a more presentable form. In some cases the transformation may lead to or result in new knowledge being generated.
Perplexity is based upon ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Standard LLM tools. It isn't necessarily the most current or capable solution present at this time. Genealogical "research" would be considered a niche area which current systems are not developed to address with a high degree of accuracy. In terms of comparing available options you could start at https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro/ to see the differentiation present between the current LLMs.
I should note my negative bias concerning Copilot as Microsoft's attempt at "super Clippy". Yuck! It is being implemented to supposedly help optimize the use of Microsoft tools and the information they process. Context specific assistance. It has been hilariously bad at correctly capturing and properly processing information in a number of disciplines. Editorial suggestions for compositions may not be the greatest. Scientific meeting transcripts and summarizations need a lot of manual curation before being considered accurate. The presence of corporate or scientific acronyms and the corresponding alphabet soup of contractions are not processed well. Glip glip glip. No that is GLP-1.
Wayne
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:59:54 PM EDT, Atticus Beachy atticus.beachy@protonmail.com wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Kind regards,Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
I think you are to focused on the concept of "search." What is being addressed by AI is the collection, filtering, and transformation of information into a more presentable form. In some cases the transformation may lead to or result in new knowledge being generated.
Perplexity is based upon ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Standard LLM tools. It isn't necessarily the most current or capable solution present at this time. Genealogical "research" would be considered a niche area which current systems are not developed to address with a high degree of accuracy. In terms of comparing available options you could start at https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro/ to see the differentiation present between the current LLMs.
I should note my negative bias concerning Copilot as Microsoft's attempt at "super Clippy". Yuck! It is being implemented to supposedly help optimize the use of Microsoft tools and the information they process. Context specific assistance. It has been hilariously bad at correctly capturing and properly processing information in a number of disciplines. Editorial suggestions for compositions may not be the greatest. Scientific meeting transcripts and summarizations need a lot of manual curation before being considered accurate. The presence of corporate or scientific acronyms and the corresponding alphabet soup of contractions are not processed well. Glip glip glip. No that is GLP-1.
Wayne
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:59:54 PM EDT, Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com> wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Kind regards,Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
- Wayne
AB
Atticus Beachy
Fri, May 16, 2025 3:37 AM
Hi Wayne,
AI has a huge number of applications. But it is fundamentally unreliable. E.g., earlier today an AI told me "For African populations, approximately 75%-85% of people have brown eyes". I then asked it to identify any errors in its previous response, and it doubled down and repeated the claim.
This unreliability means that AI is most useful for tasks where you can quickly verify whether a given answer is correct. (E.g., it is great for writing computer code, which you can quickly test by running.) For Genealogical research, the only way to verify the AI's claims is by looking at the source where the AI got the information. Otherwise you have no idea whether anything the AI is saying has any basis in reality. That is why I am so focused on the concept of "search".
I will admit to having my own bias against Google, who released their original AI in an absurdly "woke" state. If you asked it to draw historically accurate European peasants, it would draw them as black. If you asked it to draw white European peasants, it would refuse. If you asked it to draw British royalty, it would draw them as black. If you asked it to draw Nazi soldiers from WWII, it would draw them as black. If you asked it, "Who negatively impacted society more, Elon tweeting memes or Hitler?" it would say that both caused harm but "it is not possible to say" which was worse. I don't like Microsoft either but this was a whole different level of crazy.
Best Regards,
Atticus
On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 7:24 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
I think you are to focused on the concept of "search." What is being addressed by AI is the collection, filtering, and transformation of information into a more presentable form. In some cases the transformation may lead to or result in new knowledge being generated.
Perplexity is based upon ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Standard LLM tools. It isn't necessarily the most current or capable solution present at this time. Genealogical "research" would be considered a niche area which current systems are not developed to address with a high degree of accuracy. In terms of comparing available options you could start at https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro/ to see the differentiation present between the current LLMs.
I should note my negative bias concerning Copilot as Microsoft's attempt at "super Clippy". Yuck! It is being implemented to supposedly help optimize the use of Microsoft tools and the information they process. Context specific assistance. It has been hilariously bad at correctly capturing and properly processing information in a number of disciplines. Editorial suggestions for compositions may not be the greatest. Scientific meeting transcripts and summarizations need a lot of manual curation before being considered accurate. The presence of corporate or scientific acronyms and the corresponding alphabet soup of contractions are not processed well. Glip glip glip. No that is GLP-1.
Wayne
On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:59:54 PM EDT, Atticus Beachy atticus.beachy@protonmail.com wrote:
Hi Wayne,
Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
Kind regards,Atticus
On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List list@maillist.saga-omii.org wrote:
Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
Hi Wayne,
AI has a huge number of applications. But it is fundamentally unreliable. E.g., earlier today an AI told me "For African populations, approximately 75%-85% of people have brown eyes". I then asked it to identify any errors in its previous response, and it doubled down and repeated the claim.
This unreliability means that AI is most useful for tasks where you can quickly verify whether a given answer is correct. (E.g., it is great for writing computer code, which you can quickly test by running.) For Genealogical research, the only way to verify the AI's claims is by looking at the source where the AI got the information. Otherwise you have no idea whether anything the AI is saying has any basis in reality. That is why I am so focused on the concept of "search".
I will admit to having my own bias against Google, who released their original AI in an absurdly "woke" state. If you asked it to draw historically accurate European peasants, it would draw them as black. If you asked it to draw white European peasants, it would refuse. If you asked it to draw British royalty, it would draw them as black. If you asked it to draw Nazi soldiers from WWII, it would draw them as black. If you asked it, "Who negatively impacted society more, Elon tweeting memes or Hitler?" it would say that both caused harm but "it is not possible to say" which was worse. I don't like Microsoft either but this was a whole different level of crazy.
Best Regards,
Atticus
On Thursday, May 15th, 2025 at 7:24 AM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
> I think you are to focused on the concept of "search." What is being addressed by AI is the collection, filtering, and transformation of information into a more presentable form. In some cases the transformation may lead to or result in new knowledge being generated.
>
> Perplexity is based upon ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0. Standard LLM tools. It isn't necessarily the most current or capable solution present at this time. Genealogical "research" would be considered a niche area which current systems are not developed to address with a high degree of accuracy. In terms of comparing available options you could start at https://deepmind.google/technologies/gemini/pro/ to see the differentiation present between the current LLMs.
>
> I should note my negative bias concerning Copilot as Microsoft's attempt at "super Clippy". Yuck! It is being implemented to supposedly help optimize the use of Microsoft tools and the information they process. Context specific assistance. It has been hilariously bad at correctly capturing and properly processing information in a number of disciplines. Editorial suggestions for compositions may not be the greatest. Scientific meeting transcripts and summarizations need a lot of manual curation before being considered accurate. The presence of corporate or scientific acronyms and the corresponding alphabet soup of contractions are not processed well. Glip glip glip. No that is GLP-1.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Wednesday, May 14, 2025 at 10:59:54 PM EDT, Atticus Beachy <atticus.beachy@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Wayne,
>
> Perplexity has two modes. There is ordinary "Search" mode (the default) and "Research" mode (much more in-depth). You get 3 "Research" queries per day for free. If "Research" mode is also sub-par compared to some alternative you know of, please let me know so I can switch.
>
> Perplexity is great for collecting a large number of claimed facts, but in order to verify any of the facts you will have to visit the website yourself (and then decide whether to trust the website). Perplexity cannot do your thinking for you, but it saves a lot of time collecting and organizing a list of relevant websites for you to look at.
>
> Kind regards,Atticus
>
> On Wednesday, May 14th, 2025 at 6:14 PM, Wayne Kauffman via List <list@maillist.saga-omii.org> wrote:
>
>> Perplexity seems to have a more limited set of results. The web search was visibly incomplete in terms of providing current and potentially more accurate results. Getting links to rubber-stamped incorrect data lowers the value of the result. Individuals may incorrectly assume the validity of the data due to a lack of understanding where the referenced results are incorrect. The other AI systems also provide references associated with their synopsis but it is not as obvious to access.
>>
>> Editors in the genealogical publication area are going to find it harder to weed out incorrect information due to how AI assistance can pasteurize and summarize data. Additional peer review may be needed to weed out the fabrications or incorrect summarizations.
>>
>> Last fall at work dear CoPilot indicated that the tone of some of my sentences could be deemed to be improper. I needed to do a smack-down. At times one should not sugar coat a message when a regulatory issue has been created where one should not have existed if the individual was following their training. Having the AI manage content is not necessarily a good thing. Similarly late last year co-workers were reviewing resumes for an opening. It was fairly obvious that a large percentage of the submissions utilized the same service to fabricate the content and highlight their skills. The same phrases were present across over 15 resumes. Those were quickly deleted.
>>
>> - Wayne